COVID Pandemic is Threatening India's Tigers

Mother tiger and cubs

Early this month, India's 2018 Tiger Census made it to the Guinness Book of World Records for recording an estimated 2,967 tigers or 75 percent of the world's tiger population in the country. Although this seemed like great news, India has witnessed a tremendous spike in poaching of the big cats during the COVID lockdown period implemented by the government. Wildlife trade monitoring network, Traffic, pointed out that 88 incidents of poaching were reported during the post-lockdown period from March 23 to May 3, which was nearly double the number reported during the six weeks before the lockdown. Another official data indicated that India lost 110 tigers last year, out of which one-third to poaching. A study carried out by Traffic showed that it is unclear how poaching rates increased during the lockdown, despite persistent efforts by law enforcement agencies. It further revealed that 222 people were arrested in poaching-related cases during the lockdown period across India; a surge from 85 arrests during the pre-lockdown phase. Experts think that the rise has also been noticed in the poaching of tigers' prey. A wildlife biologist named Faiyaz Khudsar stated that the loss of income and food shortages due to the lockdown forced people to resort to poaching for subsistence. In other words, as Yadvendradev Jhala of the Wildlife Institute of India (WII) puts, the poachers are taking advantage of the COVID crisis.

Tiger in Ranthambore National Park

It really disturbs me how the COVID pandemic has had and continues to have a negative impact on the world's wildlife population. I have said it before and I will say it again, the lockdown is no excuse to shy away from protecting endangered wildlife around the world. Poachers are taking advantage of the situation and going around setting traps for tigers and other animals, including their prey, to make ends meet. However, it is not just poaching that is threatening India's tigers. The COVID virus itself is also a threat. This was seen in April this year when a tigress at New York's Bronx Zoo tested positive for COVID. This news should have been perceived as a wake-up call to intensify patrolling as there is a possible virus threat to India's tiger reserves according to Faiyaz Khudsar. If the virus enters the reserves, it will affect conservation efforts very badly. In addition, there is also decrease in habitat for tigers and other animals which forces them to stray into human habitations making them easy targets for poachers and vulnerable to disease when coming into contact with domestic animals. It is not only India where tiger populations are under threat of poaching. There is a similar situation in Bangladesh, where tigers are vulnerable to poaching and shrinking habitat. I strongly urge for the need of intensive measurements in protecting populations of tigers and other animals in South Asia. Emphasis should be on bolstering patrolling efforts in tiger reserves and other protected areas and forming corridors of territorial forests with extended agricultural fields to save the animals.

View article here 

Grizzly Bears Should be Returned to the North Cascades

Grizzly bear

Grizzly bears have recently been in the news for being granted federal protection in and around the Yellowstone region. However, the battle to ensure the bears' protection and well-being in their home range is still continuing with the Center for Biological Diversity recently filing a lawsuit against the Trump administration for failing to issue public records on the completion of a program to restore the bears to the North Cascades in Washington state. Earlier this month, David L. Bernhardt, Secretary of the Interior, announced that his agency will not carry out the environmental impact statement required to move forward with the plan. The decision spurred the Center to file the lawsuit in federal court on Tuesday in Washington D.C. The lawsuit is seeking documents related to the administration's long-standing opposition to grizzly bears in the North Cascades. The debate over bringing the bears back to the North Cascades has been going for several years. The Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) recognized the North Cascades as one of the essential recovery areas for the grizzlies. It is estimated that there are only few bears in the proximity of the North Cascades in recent years. A study by the FWS in 2011 counted fewer than 20 bears on the U.S side of the border, and a hiker photographed one in 2010. In one study, the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife wrote that "grizzly bears are not currently known to occupy the North Cascades ecosystem in north-central Washington..." The Center for Biological Diversity stated that scientists think that the North Cascades area contains enough habitat to support about 280 bears. A population is known to inhabit the Selkirk Mountains in eastern Washington, but state officials think all bears in the state are individuals from other populations in Idaho and British Columbia.

View of the North Cascades

I have always learned and understood that grizzly bears once inhabited the entire western half of the U.S before being reduced to populations inhabiting Idaho, Montana, and Wyoming. They also inhabit the North Cascades in the Pacific Northwest, but they primarily consist of individuals from neighboring populations. I think it is crucial to bring grizzly bears back to the North Cascades. The region is one of several places in the western U.S where these majestic bears had disappeared decades ago. Bringing them back would greatly benefit the North Cascades ecosystem, in which they can keep the vegetation, fish, and animal populations under control. If grizzly bears in the Yellowstone region are able to keep the ecosystem healthy, why can't they do that in the North Cascades? I strongly believe that restoring grizzly bears in the North Cascades would require probably bringing the ones from other areas with larger populations, but the planning should be done concertedly. Also, the introduced bears should be monitored closely and carefully in order to see how well they are adapting to the North Cascades. Once again, it is best to leave it to scientists and experts to determine how the restoration efforts should be conducted. But the North Cascades must have grizzly bears to help sustain its ecosystem.

View article and video here                

Could the Attack By a Crocodile on a Young Mexican Boy Been Avoided?

A Morelet's crocodile in Cancun.

Crocodiles and people have long coexisted with each other. Both of them rely on lakes, rivers, and other water bodies for survival. But when the two species share the same water body, there is always a potential of conflict where one gets either seriously injured or killed. This has been an ongoing case in Africa, southern Asia, Southeast Asia, and Australia where majority of crocodile attacks on people are reported. But recently, there has been a case reported near Mexico's El Palmar Beach where a six-year-old boy was attacked by a three-meter-long Morelet's crocodile. The boy, who hailed from the municipality of Zihuatanejo de Azueta, wandered away from his parents with his sister. The pair went to a nearby estuary, next to the Pacifica Resort, which has a fenced off area and a bridge above it. The area is known to be frequented by crocodiles. Witnesses saw a crocodile grab the boy by the head and pulled him into the water to try a death roll, a technique the reptiles use spin and drown their prey. Tourists and a hotel lifeguard attempted to scare the crocodile away by throwing stones, hoping that it would release the boy. The hotel medical staff arrived on the scene to care for the boy, who had sustained a number of bites on his head, arms, legs, and chest after being dragged underwater for about ten minutes. He is currently being treated for his injuries at the general hospital.

View of El Palmar Beach

It really terrifies me whenever a victim of such an animal attack is a small child. But could the attack on this six-year-old child have been avoided? Normally Mexico's crocodiles prey on insects, fish, frogs, lizards, and small animals. But this news also points out that the Pacifica Resort hotel staff allegedly feed the crocodiles to entertain the tourists at the same estuary where the attack happened. It goes to show that crocodiles living near the resort inadvertently turned into man-eaters, due to the negative influence of tourism. It is easy to blame the crocodile for such a horrific attack, but this behavior has been attributed to the mindless actions by the resort staff all in the name of entertainment. I'm thankful that this poor child was rescued in time, but he could have been killed. It aggravates me that when carnivorous animals become accustomed to handouts given by people, they become dependent on people for food and therefore lose their natural ability to catch their own food. This is exactly what has been going on at this estuary and it has to change. I strongly urge the staff of the Pacifica Resort to refrain from entertaining tourists by feeding the crocodiles and should focus on implementing protective measurements to keep both tourists and crocodiles safe from each other. Mexico's crocodile numbers have been increasing in recent years with populations of swamp crocodiles comprising around 54,000 to 100,000 animals. Although the crocodiles are protected, not everyone, including hunters, agrees they should be protected. This has got to change! Workshops and awareness programs need to be conducted to educate the public about the importance of crocodiles to Mexico's ecosystems and how human influence turns them into man-eaters. There should also be an emphasis on identifying areas with crocodile presence and most of all, establishing rules and regulations to prevent any further crocodile attacks on people.

View article here                    

Vaccination of Asiatic Lions Should be Done With a Methodical Approach

Asiatic lion

In India's Gujarat state, the Asiatic lion population was hit hard by a canine distemper epidemic almost two years ago in which nearly 27 lions were found dead. The situation prompted the need of vaccinating the lions to prevent any further loss. A recent report by the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEFCC) indicated that the forest department is in the process of obtaining 1,000 doses of purevax ferret distemper vaccine from Merial Inc. In 2018, 1,300 doses of the vaccine were obtained, out of which 1,100 had been utilized. Between January and May, as many as 85 lions died. Out of these deaths, 59 occurred in the Gir East Division, the same area where the virus killed the 27 lions in 2018 in a period of less than two months. The report did not affirm the canine distemper virus (CDV) or any other virus as the cause of death of the lions. In response to the deaths, the ministry advised establishing a special committee of experts by the government of Gujarat to investigate the exact cause. The report's findings showed that the lion mortality during the years 2018 and 2019 were 112 and 134 respectively. Forest department stated that new vaccines have started arriving and may soon be provided to the lions. The Indian Council for Medical Research had in October 2018 suggested "existing CDV vaccine which should work as protective intervention against Gir lions." The decision, however, did not sit well with many wildlife experts who felt it can further put the lions' lives in jeopardy. Currently, there is no CDV vaccine for the cat family and the only ones available are for dogs and ferrets.

Canine distemper virus cytoplasmic inclusion body

I find it very disappointing that the forest department of Gujarat decided to simply provide the current CDV vaccine to the lions without taking any careful steps in testing the vaccine once they obtain it. I strongly recommend the forest department and anybody involved in the vaccination of the lions to take the warnings presented by wildlife experts into consideration. For example, a veterinary official pointed out that since no challenge studies have been conducted, then no claims would be made that antibodies made by the vaccine in lions to protect them against the virus. He further added that clinical trials of any vaccine need to be carried out to test its efficiency including its long term and short term side effects. Adding to the point, a researcher from Wildlife Institute of India (WII) indicated that the vaccine should be used on captive lions and not wild ones. This vaccine can only give immunity against canine distemper for roughly six months or so. I strongly urge the forest department to take the experts' advice into serious consideration. I believe that a great deal of research needs to be undertaken to develop a CDV vaccine specifically for big cats, but that can take time. Right now, I would recommend utilizing the current vaccine on foxes, jackals, wolves, and stray dogs in Gujarat, in order to prevent the lion population from again plummeting to the CDV virus in the future.

View article here

Will the Introduction of European Bison in United Kingdom be Beneficial to the Local Wildlife?

European bison

The European bison is one of the most majestic of Eurasia's animals. Like its American cousin, it had also suffered terribly in the hands of humans across its Eurasian homeland eventually becoming extinct in the wild in 1927. By that year, fewer than 50 of these gigantic animals remained mostly in captivity. Thankfully, the bison was saved with captive breeding programs and reintroductions throughout its former haunts over a span of several decades. The European bison now exists in the forests of mainland Europe and Russia, with majority of free-ranging herds living in Poland. But now, it has been recently reported that the bison will be introduced in the United Kingdom as part of a 1-million-pound conservation project. The project, initiated by the Kent Wildlife Trust and the Woodland Trust, is focused on helping to manage Blean Woods near Canterbury. The release site is a 500-hectare area with other grazing animals such as Konik horses. Conservationists explained that the bison would be beneficial in the restoration of the habitat and the wildlife. This would be seen in their behavior of felling trees by rubbing against them to create space for sunlight which would help plants such as cow wheat to grow. The cow wheat is known to attract a butterfly known as the heath fritillary. In addition, when the bison take dust baths, they would create patches of bare earth in the process which are good for lizards and rare cultivable weeds. Also, their stripping of tree bark would create standing dead wood for fungi and insects like stag beetles. The bison will be introduced by spring of 2022. Preparation by the charities will commence in the next 18 months, which includes establishing a fenced enclosure. The project will be funded by the People's Postcode Lottery Dream Fund.

Blean Woods

I find it very amazing that the European bison will be introduced in the United Kingdom in the coming. I had long believed and understood that these bison are native to mainland Europe. However, they happen to be closely related to the prehistoric steppe bison which once roamed Britain. This means that the introduction efforts of bison in Britain will probably not have any negative impact on the local wildlife. Conservationists pointed out the ecological benefits the bison will have on the ecosystem. For example, Paul Hadaway of Kent Wildlife Trust stated that using the bison to restore the local habitat is essential to establishing bio-abundance in the landscape. He further added that a "nature-based solution is the right one to tackling climate and nature crisis we now face." I think it would not hurt to introduce the bison on an experimental basis and closely monitor the animals to see how they are doing and how the ecosystem is functioning. This way, everyone would know the overall health of Blean Woods.

View article here       

Victory as Yellowstone's Grizzly Bears Are to Remain Federally Protected!

Grizzly bear

Grizzly bears living within the vicinity of Yellowstone National Park have long been subject of debate as to whether to keep them as endangered species or delisting them. Two years ago, a federal judge proclaimed that the bears be kept under federal protection and off-limits to state hunts. Now, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in support of the judge's decision. The ruling came from Portland, Oregon, where the Ninth Circuit obtained plaintiffs' arguments and U.S District Court Judge Dana Christensen's declaration that the U.S Fish and Wildlife Service failed in planning to safeguard the genetic health of the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem's grizzly population. Appeals judges also favored the district court's determination on "recalibration," i.e., changing to a different method to count grizzlies, which could have bolstered the number of bears that states aimed at during hunts. The decision has been cheered by a host of advocacy groups, Native American tribes, and other individuals who participated in the lawsuit. They included the Crow Indian Tribe and the Piikani Nation. Advocacy groups included the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS), Alliance for the Wild Rockies, National Parks Conservation Association, and WildEarth Guardians. Andrea Zaccardi, a senior attorney of the Center of Biological Diversity, maintained that the court's decision confirms that the Fish and Wildlife Service had tried too early to remove protections of grizzly bears. She also hopes that the agency will concentrate on fully reviving the bears and not stripping them of required protections.

View of the Grand Canyon of Yellowstone

I'm also very happy that the appeals court has ruled in favor of the protection of Yellowstone's grizzly bears. These majestic animals currently number about 700 animals in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem, where they are carefully observed and populations estimated annually. An immense number of bears lives on the peripheries of the region, and their populated range has spread regularly over the years. They have not joined with grizzly bears from the Northern Continental Divide Ecosystem, so Yellowstone's grizzlies continue to establish a remote, island population. Wyoming, which had planned to hunt its peripheral grizzlies, joined the lawsuit as an intervener. The state disagreed with the Fish and Wildlife Service over what to dispute, and unsuccessfully tried to appeal concerns that federal wildlife officials were not disputing. I think to properly manage Yellowstone's grizzly bear population would be to consult with experts and organizations of experts such as the Center for Biological Diversity. These people have the knowledge and expertise in understanding the condition of bear populations, which would help in determining whether to delist them as endangered species or not. But right now, Yellowstone's grizzly bears are to be kept under federal protection.

View article here    

India's Human-Leopard Conflict Should be Handled in a Concerted and Collected Way

Forest officials inspecting a cage trap intended to catch a leopard that recently killed a one-and-half-year old child.

In India, the leopard is the most widespread of the big cats. Its range has been known to extend close to human habitations due to people pushing into the big cat's habitat. This results in incidences of human-leopard conflicts with people either getting seriously injured or even killed. The response for such incidences by villagers is call for retaliation against the leopard and kill it in cold blood. This was the recent case in Udal village in the town of Almora, Uttarakhand where a leopard killed a one-and-half-year old child in front of its mother while playing in the courtyard of her house. The incident sparked a furious outcry among the villagers, who protested with the child's body and called for the leopard to be killed. Divisional Forest Officer (DFO) Mahatim Singh Yadav stated that a permission has been given through an order declared by the chief wildlife warden to trap or tranquilize the leopard. He further added that forest officials have also been given permission to kill the animal if they fail to catch it. The deceased's family has been given a compensation of Rs. 90,000 and the remaining amount - Rs. 2.10 lakh - would be later provided. A cage has been set up in the area where the child's body was found, along with camera traps. Another cage has been installed in the village on Wednesday. In addition to forest officials, a hunter from Uttar Pradesh's Bijnor area has been called to kill the leopard. Wildlife experts, however, found the move questionable. A wildlife expert based in Ramnagar, A.G Ansari, stated that it is only relevant to kill a leopard if it has killed five people and poses a threat. Otherwise, it would be illegal. He further pointed out that how can forest officials say if the leopard they either capture or kill is the same one that killed this child. He suggested that forest officials should focus on capturing and tranquilizing the leopard, rather than kill it.

An Indian leopard in its natural habitat

I strongly agree with Mr. Ansari's words of advice when it comes to dealing with India's growing human-leopard conflict. I firmly believe that forest officials should adhere to his advice in dealing with this recent incident in which a child lost its life to a leopard. I very much understand the pain it has inflicted upon the child's family and the entire village, but resorting to mob justice is not the way to solve the problem. All across India, whenever a person, especially a child, is killed in a leopard attack, the entire village would go on a witch hunt, find a leopard (any leopard) and ruthlessly kill it. In June 2018, villagers set a forest on fire in Uttarakhand's Harinagari area in Bageshwar district after a leopard killed a seven-year-old boy. These indiscriminate killings are intolerable! Combating human-leopard conflict in India should be done in a concerted and collected way that neither people nor leopards are harmed. This includes collaborating with wildlife experts and considering their professional advice and acting upon it. I also recommend that substantial barricades should be implemented around the peripheries of villages frequented by leopards and that villagers should be educated on why leopards resort to attacking people and what measurements should be taken to tackle any conflict issues. When a leopard attacks and injures or kills a human being, it is because human beings moved into its habitat and converted it into their community by clearing vegetation to build their houses and farmland and killing off the big cat's natural prey. This, in turn, changes the leopard's behavior and it will venture into villages to search for food. As a result, people get caught in the crossfire and therefore the big cat gets blamed for causing nuisance. It just goes to show that man-eaters are man-made.

View article here                                  

Human Influence has Inadvertently Turned Gujarat's Crocodiles into Man-eaters

The crocodile which killed a woman in Vadodara after its capture

Every year in India during the monsoon season, rivers across the country burst their banks destroying anyone and anything in their path. But in some parts of the country, the floods inadvertently bring wildlife right to the people's doorstep. This is the case in Gujarat's Vadodara district where marsh crocodiles are known to swim upstream from nearby rivers during the monsoon season often ending up in city's waterways. The movement also leads to human-crocodile conflict in which people get killed during such encounters. This was recently a case in which a 13-foot crocodile attacked and killed a 54-year-old woman from Mahadevpura village in Vadodara's Waghodia taluka, who was washing clothes on the banks of Dev River on Friday. Responding to the attack, the villagers attempted to rescue the woman who was being dragged by her leg. The struggle lasted for an hour with the woman losing a major portion of her leg to the crocodile and succumbing to her injuries. A team of crocodile catchers led by an animal activist named Hemant Vadhwana joined forces with the forest department team led by Kashyap Patel in an effort to capture the crocodile. They set up a trap to lure the crocodile from the water. The process took 36 hours and once the animal emerged, a lasso was thrown around its neck and it was pulled out. The crocodile has now been handed over to the forest department.

Marsh crocodile in Gujarat

I find it very disturbing that every monsoon season in Vadodara district sees incidences of human-crocodile conflicts and the tragedies associated with them. But what truly appalls me is that people inadvertently turned the crocodiles of Vadodara district into man-eaters over the years by dumping biomedical waste in the form of human body parts. It goes to show that man-eaters are man-made. This crocodile that recently killed a woman had also killed seven others--many of whom were washing clothes on the riverbank during a span of seven years. Its man-eating behavior is probably attributed to the consumption of human body parts dumped in one part of Dev River close to a charitable hospital for cancer patients. I strongly urge that measurements need to be taken to properly dispose of biomedical waste from hospitals in the vicinity of rivers where crocodiles reside. Dumping human body parts has been resulting in them to develop taste from human flesh and it is because of this that the villagers are constantly attacked and killed. I also believe that in order to prevent crocodile attacks, special barricades should be built in rivers to keep the crocodiles as far away from villagers as possible. This way, villagers can wash their clothes and vessels and bathe without fear of being attacked. Furthermore, efforts should be implemented in curbing the pollution levels of crocodile-filled rivers which includes removal of any biomedical waste.

View article here          

Stray Dog Population Control in India's Desert National Park Needs to Be Improved

A stray dog feeding on a spiny-tailed lizard

In some parts of India, stray dogs pose a threat to the country's wildlife. These places include certain protected areas where there are no powerful predators such as lions, tigers, and leopards. One of these places is Desert National Park in Rajasthan. Situated near the towns of Barmer and Jaisalmer, it is one of the largest national parks covering an area of 1,221 square miles and is home to a rich variety of desert wildlife. One of the most iconic species of animals that makes its home in this desert oasis is the critically endangered great Indian bustard. With as many as 150 of these birds remaining in India, it is teetering on the brink of extinction due to loss of habitat and hunting. Desert National Park is the last refuge for this majestic bird, where its numbers have started to rise thanks to joint conservation efforts of the forest department and several community-minded people. However, the presence of stray dogs is driving the bustards away from their habitat. The birds, known to be shy by nature, are also said to not return to the area from where they had been driven off by the dogs. But it is not just the birds that are threatened by the dogs. According to wildlife biologist Dr. Sumit Dookia of Guru Gobind Singh Indraprasth University, the dogs have also been observed hunting blackbuck, chinkara, and even nilgai. An extensive strategy to curb the threat of dogs is needed to prevent them from causing further damage to the ecosystem. The forest department in partnership with the Wildlife Institute of India (WII) had launched a sterilization program targeted at dogs roaming near bustard enclosures in Desert National Park. The program achieved minimal success but its second phase is still anticipated. Deputy Conservator of Forest (DCF) Kapil Chandrawal stated that the department is currently capturing dogs and releasing them outside, but that does not solve the problem as a whole. He further added that the department is also conducting an awareness program in local villages asking them not to encourage the stray dog population in the area.

A pair of great Indian bustards in Desert National Park

I strongly feel that efforts to control the stray dog population in Desert National Park needs to be significantly improved in order to protect the park's wildlife. Simply catching the dogs and then releasing them outside the national park will not make any difference on the long run, as these animals would always return. There should be an initiation of adoption programs on a large-scale with involvement of animal welfare departments from across the country. These programs should include an establishment of animal shelters specifically designed for the welfare of these dogs, where people can come and see which one(s) they want to adopt. Before putting up any dog for adoption, these animals need to be thoroughly examined for any diseases and parasites and treated accordingly. India's stray dogs roaming in the vicinity of protected areas with the absence of powerful predators are a menacing threat to the wildlife. Not only do they prey on the animals, but also spread diseases such as rabies and canine distemper. Desert National Park is currently the last strong hold of the great Indian bustard and any delay in bettering its stray dog situation would further push the bird towards the brink of extinction.

View article here             

Strong Measurements Needed to Ensure Safety of Kaziranga's Wildlife During Monsoon Floods

Assam forest minister Parimal Suklabaidya checking the flood situation in Kaziranga National Park. 

India's Kaziranga National Park lies in the vicinity of the mighty Brahmaputra River. Every year, the national park receives an annual downpour of monsoon rains which in turn leads to massive flooding from the river. As a result, several animals are forced to move to higher ground for safety. However, the movement is also met with dire consequences in the form of vehicular accidents. This was the case recently when about seven hog deer were killed and another injured by vehicles along the NH-37, while they were moving to higher ground to avoid the monsoon floods. The deer and other animals are known to often cross the highway that passes through Kaziranga for refuge on the neighboring hills of Karbi Anglong district. Since June 28, 662 vehicles had been found disregarding the 40-km speed limit while taking the stretch of that highway which joins upper Assam with the rest of India. So far, seven vehicles have been fined for violating the speed limit which is enforced during the floods to investigate the deaths of animals along the stretch. In addition to vehicular accidents, animals are also vulnerable to poaching during the monsoon floods. According to park director P. Sivakumar, two people, Biswajit Baruah and Akaman Lora Borah, were arrested on Wednesday in Biswanath district for poaching hog deer. The two men were captured while cooking deer meat at their farm near a river. Authorities also recovered three pieces of fresh deer skin after arresting them.

Hog deer

I have a strong feeling that intensive measurements need to be undertaken to ensure the protection of Kaziranga's wildlife regardless of weather conditions. Even though monsoon floods spell disaster for both people and wildlife, it does not deter poachers from targeting the animals. Poachers are known to recognize the routes used by animals when seeking shelter on higher ground. I think in order to ensure protection of wildlife, forest camps should be established in the vicinity of routes used by animals to escape the floods. In addition, patrols should be carried out in order to keep a look out for poachers and catch them hopefully before any animal is killed. There should also be a strict policy regarding vehicular accidents in which the animals, including endangered species, are killed. Hog deer are one of such endangered animals that fall victim to such incidents. Should drivers end up hitting and killing any of the endangered species, they should not only be fined but also held accountable for their deaths.

View article here 

What is Behind the Deaths of Botswana's Elephants?

A dead elephant near a waterhole.

Over the last two months, Botswana has been plagued by deaths of hundreds of elephants and no one knows why. According to biologist Dr. Niall McCann of U.K's National Park Rescue, he and his colleagues found more than 350 elephant carcasses in the Okavango Delta. The government stated that lad results on samples collected are still weeks away. Dr. McCann stated that local conservationists first notified the government in early May after they flew over the delta. A total of 169 carcasses were sighted during the three-hour flight and a month later, that figure increased to 350. The government dismissed poaching as the cause of deaths since the elephants' tusks were not removed. Dr. McCann further added that no other animals other than elephants are dying. He experimentally dismissed natural anthrax poisoning, which killed about 100 elephants in the country last year. The way the elephants appeared to be dying consisted of them walking around in circles until dropping down on their faces, which Dr. McCann pointed out to be something possibly attacking their neurological systems. Either way, there has been no possible answer of what could be the cause of the elephants' deaths.

A dead elephant

I find this issue to be extremely calamitous and there has been a constant struggle in determining what is behind the deaths of Botswana's elephants. It arises so many questions such as "Could there be something in the water, food, or soil that is killing the elephants?" or "Is there some kind of a disease that is decimating the country's elephant population?" The second question touches on an issue in India almost two years ago when the Asiatic lion population became devastated by a combination of canine distemper and babesiosis in which 24 animals died. The lion population had been increasing substantially and dispersing beyond the borders of Gir Forest National Park and into areas where they had once disappeared. Even though the results of the analysis of samples collected are weeks away, I think it is crucial to further investigate the elephant mortality in Botswana. This includes conducting more aerial surveys to see the state of the current figures. In addition, more samples need to be collected in the form of water, vegetation, soil, and elephant blood for analysis.

View article here         

Yellowstone's Bear-Bison Conflict Recorded

A grizzly bear taking on a bison in Yellowstone National Park.

The Yellowstone National Park conjures up an image of a quintessential American wilderness and a home to a wide variety of animals unique to America's wild side. Among the animals making their home in this rugged, untamed landscape are the two most powerful giants: the bison and the grizzly bear. Each one epitomizes the spirit of America's natural heritage. The bison provides food for the park's wolf population, while the bear keeps the plant and small animal populations in check. When it comes to feeding on larger animals like bison, the bear limits itself to scavenging carcasses of such animals. However, on rare occasions, it may choose to target a live one. This was a recent case when a grizzly bear was captured on video attempting to bring down a young, yet well-grown bison near a parking lot on the east side of the Firehole River in the Midway Geyser Basin. Initially, the bison stood its ground and charged towards the bear forcing it to retreat. But then, the bear turned towards its opponent after retreating less than ten yards. Eventually, it grabbed the bison from behind and held on its prey while biting down on its spine just above the hindquarters in an attempt to bring it down and kill it. At the same time, the bear was shaking its head back and forth as the bison slowly wandered past a row of parked cars. The two animals then advanced onto a paved trail leading to a bridge over the Firehole River. After crossing the bridge, they waded into the river and went downstream until the bison succumbed to the bear's strength and power as the two animals came close to the riverbank. The bear then temporarily left the bison to look around before returning to its prey and tear at its flesh.

The two animals are now on the bridge over the Firehole River.

I find it really extraordinary and awe-inspiring that such a rarely-seen dramatic event unfolded in Yellowstone National Park. Usually when a grizzly bear and a bison come into conflict with one another, the bison stands its ground and the bear backs away without a fight. But sometimes, tables get turned. And that is exactly what happened here. Rather than turn tail after a brief retreat, this bear stood its ground and attacked its adversary and would-be prey. According to Yellowstone bear biologist Kerry Gunther, the park's staff does not see bears kill bison very often but it probably happens more often than known. However, such encounters are normally not noticeable. After letting the grizzly bear feast on its prey, the park staff moved the carcass to a dump site in order to keep both predators and people safe from each other. I find that this footage gives an explicit picture of just how powerful grizzly bears in Yellowstone are. Mr. Gunther once saw a large male grizzly kill an adult bison cow and also bison carcasses with bite marks along the spine. He even one time saw a bear chase off a pack of wolves trying to kill a bison before ultimately finishing the animal itself. This goes to show that Yellowstone's grizzly bears are on the top of the food chain and are always on the look out for an opportunity when it comes to finding food. Even if it means going after a full-grown bison!

View article and video here