Thursday, March 8, 2018

Why is the U.S Federal Government Blind to the Aweful Truth Behind Africa's Elephant Poaching?

A pair of elephants in confrontation

Over three months ago, the Trump administration paused an attempt to lift the ban on importing Africa's elephants as trophies from Zambia and Zimbabwe after a public outcry. But now, it appears that the administration has finally lifted the ban in secret. This was seen in an unannounced memo by the U.S Fish and Wildlife Service in which the agency stated that it will favor importation permits "on a case-by-case basis." It did not explain the exact guidelines by which the permits would be judged. In addition, it is also unclear what role was played in President Trump's decision, who has publicly declared his opposition many times to lift the ban as recent as late January. However, since President Trump's decision to put that move on hold, the DC Circuit Court of Appeals judged that the Obama administration did not properly observe the rules around making a new regulation, such as welcoming public comment. The ruling also discussed a lawsuit brought by Safari Club International and the National Rifle Association. The U.S Fish and Wildlife Service directly noted the court ruling in its letter, stating that as a result it was pulling out many past Endangered Species Act findings going back to 1995. In the recent memo, the agency stated that the findings "are no longer effective for making individual permit determinations for imports of those sport-hunted ESA-listed species," including not just African elephants but also South Africa's bonteboks and lions. The agency further added that it would still use some information in those findings, whenever suitable to the examination of an individual permit application. Although it did not publicly announce, news about the agency's decision arose by various media outlets.
The Trump administration quietly made its decision to import elephant trophies from Africa.

I really don't think the federal government of the United States understands the fact that hunting wild elephants for sport in their African homeland would not help in protecting and conserving them. These majestic animals' numbers continue to decline. A census revealed that their population collapsed by roughly 30 percent from 2007 to 2014 alone. Much of the decline has been due to the insatiable demand of ivory by the global criminal empire and terrorist organizations. These factions include the Lord's Resistance Army (LRA), Janjaweed, and Al-Shabaab who profit from elephant ivory which helps them continue their reign of terror directed at both local people and foreign nationals. Al-Shabaab was responsible for a horrific attack at a shopping mall in Nairobi in 2013 which claimed lives of 87 people, including 19 foreign nationals. I find it extremely frustrating beyond belief that the federal government and the U.S Fish and Wildlife Service do not recognize that the illegal poaching of elephants and trade of their ivory tusks is more than just a conservation issue. It is also a matter of public security on both national and international levels. I also find it equally unacceptable that President Trump is keeping this controversial issue of importing elephant trophies into the U.S behind closed doors. He does not seem to understand that behind the ruthless killing of elephants for their ivory is more carnage and bloodshed directed towards innocent African and non-African civilians. It goes to show that neither he nor his administration are in good terms with both national and international conservation groups. I urge the federal government and the U.S Fish and Wildlife Service to reconsider its decision and actions related to this matter. Controlled hunting wild animals whose populations have plummeted dramatically in recent years will not make any difference. The main priority should be to combat the poaching of elephants and trade of their ivory tusks.

View article here       

Tuesday, March 6, 2018

Cambodia's Leopards In Desperate Need of Help as Extinction Looms Over the Horizon

An Indochinese leopard in its natural habitat

The Asiatic cheetah currently numbers less than 53 in its Iranian homeland, making it one of the most critically endangered of the big cats that is on the brink of extinction. But now, there is another big cat that has and still is suffering the same fate as the Asiatic cheetah: the Indochinese leopard. A recent study has confirmed that the world's last breeding population of leopards in Cambodia is at "immediate risk" of extinction, having dwindled an overwhelming 72 percent in over five years. The research, published in the Royal Society Open Science journal, was carried out in the country's Eastern Plains Landscape and disclosed one of the lowest concentrations ever documented, with a density of one individual per 100 square kilometers. It indicated that that heightened poaching, particularly extensive snaring for the illegal wildlife trade and bushmeat, is to blame for the startling decline. According to the study's co-author and Southeast Asia leopard program coordinator for Panthera, Dr. Jan Kamler, this leopard population "represents the last glimmer of hope" for the animals not just in Cambodia but also Laos and Vietnam. He urged the need to come together in action, not only in words, to suppress the "epidemic of poaching facing this gorgeous big cat and others around the globe." Another co-author, Professor David MacDonald, who is also the director of Oxford University's Wildlife Conservation Research Unit (WildCRU), added that Southeast Asia's leopards are doing "worse than people thought and are heading for catastrophe." Incited by the study's discoveries, Panthera and WildCRU are working with local and national groups to bolster efficient law enforcement and monitoring in the region, which will include the utilization of PoacherCams. A different study recently estimated that just over 1,000 breeding leopards remain in Southeast Asia, but conservationists stated that only 20 to 30 reproductive individuals remain in Cambodia.
An Indochinese leopard caught on camera trap.

I cannot think of anything more shocking and heartbreaking than what has been revealed in this study. The Indochinese leopard, like its relative the Asiatic cheetah, is teetering on the brink of extinction due to a large scale of poaching in the form of snare traps for bushmeat and the illegal wildlife trade, loss of habitat, decline in prey, and conflicts with people. I find it outrageous that the illegal wildlife trade continues to operate with impunity, bringing more and more species of wildlife in Southeast Asia and elsewhere in the world closer to extinction on a global scale. I also find it extremely painful and unacceptable that Cambodia has let the tiger become extinct and is now doing the same thing to the leopard I urge the people and the government of Cambodia, as well as in rest of Southeast Asia, to wake up and promptly act upon this issue of Indochinese leopards on the verge of extinction. Otherwise, the international organizations like the IUCN will be forced to declare Cambodia's wildlife conservation, particularly of leopards, a failure just like in the case of Iran's cheetah conservation project. It is a high time to take drastic and efficient action to save both, the Asiatic cheetah and the Indochinese leopard, along with all the other species of big cats as these animals are in a desperate need of help.

View article here             

Sunday, March 4, 2018

World Leaders Should Follow Kenya's Example in Combating the Illegal Wildlife Trade

First Lady Margaret Kenyatta

Kenya's First Lady Margaret Kenyatta recently demanded a cooperative approach that embraces technology in battling the illegal wildlife trade. She pointed out that one of the biggest challenges that wildlife conservation is facing is the sophistication of the methods utilized by wildlife traffickers around the world. The First Lady was speaking at the Kenya Airways Pride Center in Nairobi's Embakasi division when she officially initiated an "awareness workshop on combating the illegal wildlife trafficking." The workshop was directed at providing training to airport and airline staff on the dangers of wildlife smuggling. While saying that wildlife conservation is becoming an increasingly important worldwide issue, the First Lady stated that focused leadership, political generosity, policies and impositions of bans have helped Kenya in recording substantial progress in battling the illegal wildlife trade. She underlined the need for a concerted approach that would utilize the complimentary efficiencies of various sectors and groups, stating that exceptional intelligence and new methods must be applied because pressure is mounting and countries continue to suffer massive losses. She further added that improvised and stronger networks must also be developed to close the loopholes that have enabled the growth of the illegal wildlife trade. As part of her pledge of commitment to supporting all those who aim to defend the future of Kenya's wildlife heritage, the First Lady applauded Kenya Airways for being among the airlines that have signed a declaration known as the "United for Wildlife International Transportation Taskforce", which is dedicated to zero tolerance against wildlife trade. She requested other agencies and organizations to join the conservation effort by signing the declaration to stop the illegal wildlife trade.

I'm very proud that First Lady Margaret Kenyatta has called for a mutual approach that embraces technology in fighting the illegal wildlife trade. It shows that she recognizes the significance of the issue and why it is extremely essential to put a stop to it. I believe that world leaders from various other countries should follow her example in an effort to stop the illegal wildlife trade from thriving. In her speech, the First Lady mentioned that stronger and better networks must be developed to close the loopholes that allowed the growth of the wildlife trade. This is highly crucial because even in countries that are committed to fight any crime against nature, there are loopholes which prevent perpetrators involved in poaching and the illegal wildlife from being severely punished for their actions. I urge the governments of other African countries and around the world to take First Lady Margaret Kenyatta's views on the illegal wildlife trade into consideration. This illicit and lucrative business is operating with impunity and requires a concerted approach amongst countries to put an end to it.

View article here             

Saturday, March 3, 2018

Venezuela's Food Crisis- Zoo Animals Severely Malnourished and in Need of Help

A malnourished puma in Venezuela's Zulia Metropolitan Zoo

Venezuela is in the grip of a food crisis, which has had a tremendous impact on the health of the local people. However, it is not just people who have been affected by the crisis. It has recently been reported that the animals of San Francisco's Zulia Metropolitan Zoo have been affected the crisis, with several species suffering from serious malnutrition. These include carnivores such as two pumas, an African lion, a Bengal tiger, a jaguar, ocelots, and birds of prey. The impact of the food crisis has forced the zoo to close down in mid-February and its workers to sacrifice ducks, goats, and pigs to feed the animals. According to one caretaker, the big cats should eat 8% and 10% of their weight per day. But due to the food shortage, they are now forced eat that amount once a week. The zoo's management admitted the awful situation and blamed it not only on food scarcity, but also lack of budget and inflation. Among the birds of prey affected by the crisis included a captive-born male and female Andean condor, which were transported to the zoo as part of a reproductive program to save the species from extinction. Both have gone weeks without being provided enough food. Others included two crested caracaras and a pair of owls, which were so starved that they ate other birds of prey in their respectable enclosures. After the situation cropped up, Dirwings Arrieta, the mayor of San Francisco, announced that the zoo would be reconstructed, indicating that authorities have started to repair the water system and increase the workers' wages. However, he did not make reference to malnourishment. Actor and philanthropist Raul Julia-Levy stated that his foundation, Flaunt My Pet LLC, stated that he was willing to help by addressing President Nicolas Maduro in a Twitter message. Dr. Carlos Silva, the zoo's veterinarian of 13 years, however, is not confident about the future of Venezuela's zoos.
An undernourished tiger in Zulia Metropolitan Zoo.

I find it extremely disturbing that Venezuela has been badly hit by a food crisis. This situation is not just affecting the health of people, but also zoo animals. Some of these animals include a breeding pair of Andean condors, which were brought to the facility as part of a reproductive program to save the species from extinction. This food crisis is a huge hurdle affecting conservation efforts to save the Andean condor and I think it is a high time to act upon it. I also find it very frustrating and unacceptable that Mayor Arrieta failed to acknowledge the undernourishment of the animals. This does not sit well with the people San Francisco, who come to the zoo to see the animals with their families. I urge the governments of South America and other countries to help Venezuela in this critical time by providing not just food for the people, but also proper medical care. In addition, I strongly urge Venezuela, its neighbors, and other countries to not neglect the health of the animals at the Zulia Metropolitan Zoo. These animals are in a dire need of help like Venezuela's people and it is extremely essential to do something.

View article here

Thursday, March 1, 2018

Stiff Penalties Needed for Convicted Elephant Poachers and Ivory Smugglers

Elephant ivory confiscated from Nouabale-Ndoki National Park

The Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS) recently reported that three men have been convicted in the Republic of the Congo of killing elephants for their tusks and sentenced to five years in jail, along with being fined an equivalent of $10,000 each. The trio were part of a group of six poachers who reportedly invaded Nouabale-Ndoki National Park on January 13 and  were first sighted by researchers from the Goualougo Triangle Ape Project working in the southern part of the national park. Following information of gunfire, park authorities deployed four ranger teams who ambushed the poachers on February 2. However, the six-man group was able to escape but left behind sixteen tusks, along with equipment including an AK-47 rifle. Park authorities and local police managed to arrest the first half of the gang in the adjoining town of Pokola. The remaining three members are still at large, including the group's suspected leader. The convicted men reportedly admitted to have illegally entered the national park on several previous occasions in the last four years, and taking some 881 pounds of ivory. They are also thought to have connections to some of northern Congo's most infamous elephant poachers and ivory traffickers, such as Samuel Pembele who also received a five-year prison sentence for elephant poaching in the same area in 2016, and Daring Dissaka who was sentenced last year.
Forest elephants

I really think that sentencing elephant poachers to just five years in prison is not enough to send a message that elephant poaching in Africa or anywhere in the world will not be tolerated. This ongoing issue is known to benefit not just common poachers, but also international criminal syndicates and terrorist organizations. Therefore, I believe it is crucial to impose stiff penalties on anybody involved in elephant poaching and ivory smuggling. This means that instead of five years, anybody convicted of ivory poaching and smuggling should be sentenced to either ten to twenty years or even life in prison, depending on an individual's or a group of individuals' criminal history in these crimes. It is also necessary to impose the death penalty, especially on those individuals who happen to be major underworld figures who specialize in the illegal ivory smuggling. The key is to strike fear in the hearts of these blood-thirsty criminals, who ruthlessly slaughter the world's elephant populations as well as other endangered species in Africa and beyond to feed the insatiable appetite of the global criminal empire.

View article here   

Monday, February 26, 2018

Paying Compensation to Leopard Attack Victims is Vitally Essential

Indian leopard

Last month, two residents from Mumbai's Mulund suburb were attacked and wounded by a leopard in the Nanipada locality. Despite having survived and receiving treatment, the victims claimed that neither of them were paid any compensation from the forest department for the medical expenses acquired. The victims were casual laborer Balaji Dashrath Kamite, who was lacerated on his head and face, and Krisamma Hanumant Palle, a maid in the area who is currently having treatment after the leopard bit her on her right forearm. Both of these victims were not paid compensations, and have begged honorary wildlife warden, Sunish Subramanian, to help them with the issue. Mr. Subramanian stated that he has sent the victims' medical expenses and other press clippings to the Thane forest range and hopes that the forest department fixes the issue. In addition, Jitendra Ramgaonkar, the deputy conservator of forests in Thane, assured that he will review the victims' medical bills for repayment. He notified that another leopard attack victim, who had approached the forest department with a CT scan, was already paid the medical compensation by them. Altogether, six people were injured, including Mr. Kamite and Ms. Palle. The leopard which attacked these two residents is thought to have entered the Nanipada locality from the Eastern Express Highway on January 13 and caused panic before taking refuge in a ground floor house, where it was tranquilized by the forest department and then transported to Sanjay Gandhi National Park.

I feel really bad that these two leopard attack victims had to wait for a month to be paid compensation. They are very poor and work very hard to earn decent money, in order to survive. This includes paying medical bills, along with keeping food and water on the table for themselves and their families. What can they do when there is a delay in reimbursement for an attack by a leopard? How else can these people be able to pay their medical expenses and survive? This is why I firmly believe that it is highly essential to pay compensation to victims of leopard and other animal attacks. It should be part of efforts to mitigate human-wildlife conflict in India. Furthermore, it is equally important to reach out to the public and educate them about the importance of leopards and other predators and suggest safe alternative methods to prevent further attacks. This is because whenever a leopard wreaks havoc in a locality, the response is to kill the animal in retaliation. This method is unacceptable since leopards are endangered species in India and elsewhere in the world. Instead, I feel it is important to properly manage garbage disposal since it is known to attract stray dogs and pigs which in turn draw leopards into human settlements and result in human-leopard conflict. India's leopards may not be as well-renowned to the general public like lions and tigers, but they are part of the country's natural heritage and play a crucial role in maintaining the well-being of the forests by keeping the prey population under control.

View article here  

Saturday, February 24, 2018

Could the Threat of Inbreeding Affecting Mexican Wolves Have Been Avoided?

Mexican wolf

A recent count of Mexican wolves by the U.S Fish and Wildlife Service has raised concerns among wolf advocates that inbreeding among the animals' population in Arizona and New Mexico has led to a decrease in growth. The agency, which is assigned with managing a 20-year-old program for the wolves, reported that there were 114 animals in the wild which was just one more than in 2016. In the last three years, there had been a surge of less than 5 percent in the wolf population, following roughly two years of strong growth. In the latest wolf count report, the agency mentioned a sharp decline in wolf pup survival numbers. It indicated that 50 pups survived in 2016 after being born in that year, while only 26 survived last year. In addition, 12 recorded wolf deaths were cited in 2017 and 10 wolves that were eliminated from the wild packs. When asked if the mild, dry winter affected the wild wolf numbers, U.S Fish and Wildlife Service spokesman John Bradley stated that the agency did not have data on the impact of climate factors but will be looked into.
Mexican wolf running

The agency's management of the wolf packs has been heavily criticized by the Center for Biological Diversity and members of other advocacy groups, who alleged that negligent supervision of wolf poaching and inbreeding is also contributing to the decline in wild wolf population. According to Michael Robinson of the Center for Biological Diversity, almost every wild Mexican wolf is so genetically similar to each other that they are related as if they are siblings. Mr. Bradley also agreed to the problem of inbreeding and indicated that the process of cross-fostering wild-born wolf pups with captive-born ones to help expand the animals' gene pool. However, Mr. Robinson called the solution "imperfect and not fitting the genetic emergency." He further elaborated on the difficulty of the process saying how it requires the staff to find a wolf den in which the timing of a litter's birth should firmly match that of a captive-born litter and regulating a quick exchange of pups in the wilderness shortly after they are born. He also added that even if all goes as steadily as possible, it takes about two years for a wolf pup released into the wild to start breeding.
Mexican wolf in captivity

I find it extremely disturbing on what the Center for Biological Diversity and other advocacy groups found about this recent report by the U.S Fish and Wildlife Service regarding the Mexican wolf population in the country. These animals are under grave risk of inbreeding because of the way the agency has been managing their population. This issue could have been avoided had breeding-age adult wolves been released into the wild from captivity. I really think that conserving Mexican wolves in the U.S is a task that should be best done by the Center for Biological Diversity and other groups that have the tremendous knowledge and expertise on how to properly manage populations of critically endangered and other threatened species. Furthermore, the recovery plan of the Mexican wolf should not be driven by both federal and state politics. People need to understand that the conservation of Mexican wolves and other endangered species is best done by conservation groups and similar organizations that have the knowledge and expertise on how to better maintain their populations. I urge the U.S Fish and Wildlife Service to please leave the conservation of Mexican wolves to the Center for Biological Diversity and other advocacy groups. These magnificent animals are on the brink of extinction and any misuse of conserving them can result in extinction.

View article here